News
SAMSUNG GALAXY J7 PRO
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3030/f30309b37626919b7feab908492ed56c01ff4f1d" alt="SAMSUNG GALAXY J7 PRO"
Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro
Samsung expanded their J series with the magnificent launch of Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro earlier this July. The Galaxy J7 series includes Galaxy J7 Prime, Galaxy J7 Core, and Galaxy J7 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro is a perfect mid-range Samsung phone with whooping 13 MP Camera, stylish unibody design, and great performance.
Design
This phone comes in 2 colors which includes gold and black. The unibody designed metal body is complacent in hand. It has a home button along with a capacitive button on each side. The power button is on right while volume keys are on the left side. The 3.5mm earphone jack is available at the base of the telephone.
Camera
It comes with a whopping 13MP front camera for superb selfies and 13MP rear camera. Camera’s performance is exceptionally great in daylight. It can capture video resolution up to 10801p*30fps. And not to forget, Samsung's processing image software which always enhances image quality through effects.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Pro has 1.6 GHz processor with 3GB RAM and 16GB ROM which is sufficient enough for normal multitasking. Its Internal storage is 32/64 GB which can be expanded by a Micro Sd card. Also, its gaming performance is also good, making it a perfect mid-range phone.
This does not look a bad deal at all. Visit https://wishymall.myshopify.com/blogs/news to order online. It is available for just Rs. 33,999 with free delivery across Pakistan exclusively from wishymall.myshopify.com
Your comment was posted successfully! Thank you!
1 COMMENTS FOR THIS ARTICLE
- << Anterior
- 1
- …
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- …
- 47006
- Próximo >>
Johnnyvialm says...
On February 18, 2025
darknet markets 2025 darknet markets onion address
Nadiagof says...
On February 18, 2025
Iwoxaji96
https://domitor2020.org/community/profile/celindalyman96/
https://stagingsk.getitupamerica.com/index.php/community/profile/karenvxi0573620/
https://nmpeoplesrepublick.com/community/profile/bernice2538224/
https://domitor2020.org/community/profile/willardy2476395/
https://www.joyasvalldor.com/self-improvement-success/casino-online-za-pieniadze-lub-kasyno-online-ustawa-hazardowa/
https://gravatar.com/poetrystarstruckd1739b4abe
https://earthpeopletechnology.com/forums/profile/karmajosephson
https://www.joyasvalldor.com/self-improvement-success/kasyna-w-polsce-legalne-oraz-kasyno-online-na-sms/
https://domitor2020.org/community/profile/alexisskurrie3/
https://pl.gravatar.com/legalnemaszynyhazardoweonline
https://www.ch-valence-pro.fr/CollDSIO/community/profile/valentinahertzl/
https://pl.gravatar.com/porfovarwaweedwheels
https://pl.gravatar.com/lornibawinitwa
Billvialm says...
On February 18, 2025
darknet links darkmarkets
Lennyvialm says...
On February 18, 2025
darkmarket link dark market url
AntonioMub says...
On February 18, 2025
Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed
раз анальный секс
Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked.
The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners.
Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed.
The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts
Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss.
Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses.
The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson.
In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.